(image from Another Cartoon Brouhaha from the New Charm School blog)We're not happy to report this but we're also not surprised by the ABA's recent article Women Lawyers at the Top Earn Significantly Less than Men by writer Debra Cassens Weiss.
We're counting on the next generation making the difference at the top because young women professionals have already made a difference at the entry level as we discussed here.
Listen, the top is now dominated by the baby boom generation. As a member of that generation, I can regale you with stories of the shockingly unequal society I was born into and raised in.
The "second wave" women's movement didn't really begin until I graduated from high school in 1970.
In my senior year, the aptitude tests given to answer the question "what do I do NOW?" were "pink" and "blue." If you took the "pink" test (do you wonder why I hate pink?) and you had an aptitude for math, you were advised to go into nursing or teaching grade school. If you had the blue test, you were told to be a doctor or an engineer.
The "want ads" in those years also had one set of job opportunities for women and another for men. "Men wanted" and "women wanted." It was a very big deal to change these things.
The women professionals of my generation had to work twice as hard just to be a lawyer -- something the men of my generation could take for granted if they had the background, talent, ability, ambition, etc. necessary to make the grade. We also had to make some very hard choices between career and family -- choices that women still have to make today but that come without the "see I told you so's" that ours were likely to trigger.
So I'm not going to be too distressed that the ABA reports the following. I know the women coming up behind us are in the process of changing all of this . . . .
A new survey shows “slow progress” for women in the upper echelons of big law
firms.The survey (PDF) by the National Association of Women Lawyers finds that only 16 percent of equity partners at large law firms are women, and they earn almost $90,000 less than their male counterparts, a salary disparity that increased from a year ago.
Male equity partners earn a median salary of $625,000 and females $537,000,
the Legal Intelligencer reports. The survey says at least part of the difference may
be because of the substantially greater number of male equity partners.The pay difference is even greater at firms with higher billable-hour requirements,
where female equity partners earn $140,000 less than males.For the remainder of the article, click here.







